One of three problems I take on as a contractor, on model work that has to survive a regulatory file and not only a benchmark.
Three of them. Each one has published work behind it.
Two angiographic planes. A freehand ultrasound sweep. A stack of slices with gaps between them. The volume still has to be anatomically plausible where the acquisition never looked, and that is what a learned shape prior is for.
Self-supervised pretraining, annotation-efficient segmentation, and evaluation on the cohort you actually have rather than the one you wish you had. I report the failures too: modality-invariant pretraining helped on several tasks in our hands and hurt lesion segmentation.
Voice and handwriting carry the diagnosis too, and they are cheaper to collect than a scan. Parkinson's disease from voice recordings is my most cited work, at 180 citations.
Most first conversations do not need a contractor line and a headcount request. They need a result you can act on. So the first piece of work is a fixed scope at a fixed price, both agreed before it starts.
A negative result is a valid outcome and you get it in writing. If the method does not beat your current number, the report says so and we stop there.
Start a scoping engagementPrice quoted after the call, once the scope is agreed.
On your data, or on a public proxy if the data cannot leave. Which one is agreed before the ten days start.
One, chosen for your problem. Ten days does not buy a survey.
The result, how it was measured, and a go or no-go recommendation.
So the decision is made with me in the room, not from a PDF.
Deep learning algorithms for automatic detection and segmentation of mitral and aortic valves from 2D echocardiographic images. U-Net architecture optimized for low-contrast ultrasound data with high noise levels.
U-Net CNN architecture · Clinical validation with cardiologists · Production-ready prototype
Participation in the prestigious international KiTS21 challenge for automatic segmentation of kidneys, kidney tumors, and cysts from CT scans. Solution based on 3D residual U-Net architectures with advanced augmentation techniques.
6th place globally · 3D residual U-Net · Advanced augmentation
LLM-based system for automated identification and extraction of bioactive substances and their therapeutic effects from PubMed publications. Advanced NER and relation extraction for mapping molecules to specific diseases.
30,000 papers processed · 89.3% extraction accuracy · ChEMBL/DrugBank validation
Design and implementation of scalable cloud infrastructure for a major telecommunications provider. Containerized microservices architecture with automated deployment pipelines and integration with distributed compute resources.
Docker & Kubernetes · CI/CD automation · Enterprise scale
Cardiac ultrasound, Shifamed portfolio, since December 2022
Private cloud infrastructure for telecom, 2017 to 2022
LLM for bioactive molecules and disease mapping
Medical imaging diagnostics
Technical University of Kosice, 2023
Visiting PhD, Polytechnique Montréal, 2022
Foundation Model Challenge for Brain MRI
PyTorch · TensorFlow · Python · CUDA · OpenCV · Transformers · FastAPI · Docker · AWS · scikit-learn · ONNX · MLflow · Weights & Biases · Ray

I am Matej Gazda. PhD in artificial intelligence from the Technical University of Kosice, a visiting year in Samuel Kadoury's lab at Polytechnique Montréal, and papers in IEEE TSMC, Medical Image Analysis and npj Digital Medicine.
The part that matters to a head of R&D is the other half. Five years of software engineering at TietoEVRY before the PhD, and since December 2022 the AI engineer at Laza Medical, a Shifamed portfolio company, on cardiac ultrasound. I know what happens to a model between the paper and the clinic.
I work as an external contractor, not as a candidate for a headcount line. The usual first step is the ten day engagement above.
Biplane, freehand sweeps, slice gaps, shape priors
Pretraining and evaluation on the cohort you have
Non-image channels, from acquisition to model
Where the metric is leaking, and whether the plan holds
Thirty minutes on the problem and the metric you are judged on
Ten working days, fixed scope, report and recommendation
Your decision, taken on a number rather than on a promise
If it is a go, the method goes into your pipeline and your tests
Code, weights and the write-up your team needs to keep it running
Research & Collaboration
Peer reviewed, and linked so you can read them
IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
IEEE Access
Computers in Biology and Medicine
IEEE ISBI
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
One paragraph is enough: what you are trying to measure, what you get now, and what the data looks like. I answer within a working day and I will say if it is not my problem.